Friday, May 24, 2013

Decisive Ideas


Among the books I've recently read is

DECISIVE   How To Make Better Choices In Life And Work
Chip Heath & Dan Heath, 2013

This excellent and practical book has much to say about organizations, individuals and the future of Earth. Decisions drive the future and relative few are optimal--even at major scales. There are better ways to approach decisions and this book shares an integrated plan. 

In Chapter 5 there is discussion of the dangers of Confirmation Bias, ie seeking information that confirms initial assumptions (often self serving) and often encourages continuing down the “business as usual” path. 

To break out of that rut (the difference between a rut and a grave is the shape of the hole) we need to proactively foster constructive disagreement within our organizations. 
That’s not an easy task when many organizations are structured to suppress any dissenting opinions. 

Roger Martin is credited by the authors for devising a means around such barricades to open discussion of widely ranging options.

In considering a choice that is not high on the list of preferences, or perhaps not on that list at all, we should ask this question-- “what would it take to make this option the very best choice?”

What conditions would need to exist? What expansion of understanding would be necessary? What future scenarios might be seen as probable to make this choice take the top position on the list? 

The key is that instead of triggering instant push back and rampant nay saying from the devote corporate players, this question requires some creative thought --- without requiring abandonment of the preconceived notions they came in with. Imagining a set of conditions in which we’d change our minds can be very healthy for all of us in business and in our personal life. 

For example, what would it take for real estate brokers and agents to fold energy efficiency into the listing and selling process in both residential and commercial real estate transaction? 

A corollary would be what would it take the stare and national trade association to endorse energy efficiency as an attribute that Buyers should consider among their numerous other search criteria. 

Ocean views, school districts, living area, bedroom count, granite counters, swimming pools are considered bona fide attributes. Energy efficiency isn’t. What would it take to change that? 

Thought experiment: Make a list of 5 major conditions that would need to exist for energy efficiency to assume an important role in the decision process for choosing the best house or commercial property? 

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Selling, service, Earth

Been a while--reading lots of books and working in a very bizarre real estate market environment. Also ran SLO Half Marathon, went to state association business meetings in Sacramento, etc. Will write more on the meetings.

One of the books I read was Daniel Pink's To Sell Is Human. I've read his other books and decided to see what this one added. Unlike many books I've read lately, there is a nice wrap at the end of this book that sorta gets to the point and leaves the reader with some further questions to ponder. I'm paraphrasing a bit here for good reason.

Finally, at every opportunity you have to move someone in shaping their decisions be sure you can answer the two questions at the heart of genuine service. 

1. If the person you're selling to agrees to buy or is persuaded in their decision, will his or her life improve?

2. When your interaction with that person is over will the EARTH (Pink uses world) be a better place than when you began? 

If the answer is no, you're doing something wrong. 

Climate Change puts an interesting perspective on question #2 and Question # 1 could be expanded to include the improvement of the lives of the buyers and their descendants. The pattern of looking primarily at the immediate consequences of our actions lead us to the present situation. 

Real estate doesn't score very well on the two questions, except in a very limited sense. Escrows close and commissions are paid, but is the Earth improved by the interaction? Many would argue that the Earth's status is someone else's problem--but whose? 

Perhaps more interactions in the realm of commerce and government should ask these two questions more often.